Back to Predictions

Politics · Trump-Putin

U.S. x Russia Nuclear deal by June 30?

$42K volume$2K 24hEnds Jun 30, 20262.5c yesLive
Market

Outcome prices

YES / NO
Hide resolved
February 4$64K Vol.No
December 31$494K Vol.No
Live

This market will resolve to "Yes" if an official agreement on nuclear arms control or strategic nuclear weapons limitation is reached between the United States and the Russian Federation between December 9, 2025 and June 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.

Only agreements that are publicly announced and acknowledged by both the U.S. and Russia will qualify. The agreement must pertain to nuclear arms control or limitation—such as a treaty, framework, or memorandum—addressing matters including (but not limited to) nuclear warheads, delivery systems, verification mechanisms, or strategic stability.

An extension, amendment, or replacement of the New START treaty will qualify, provided it is publicly announced as a concluded agreement by both parties within the time frame. Exploratory discussions or stated intent to extend without a finalized agreement will not qualify.

Agreements that include both the United States and Russia as named parties—whether bilateral or as part of a broader multilateral framework—will qualify, provided the agreement directly addresses nuclear arms control.

...

Outcome proposed

Pending
...

Dispute window

Open until resolution
...

Final outcome

Awaiting official result

IronCladAlliance119d ago

Rubio: I don't have any announcement on New START. Obviously, the President's been clear in the past that in order to have true arms control in the 21st century, it's impossible to do something that doesn't include China because of their vast and rapidly growing stockpile. no china = no deal …

Porx119d ago

START treaties have been extended or re-signed for 50 years; this time, stupid Trump simply dragged things out for a few weeks or months. Those who bought "no" at such a high price were very wrong.

IronCladAlliance119d ago

Why should the "no" side be "very wrong"? Until a few weeks ago, you claimed that the treaty would be extended, and you were completely wrong. The article even says that no agreement could be reached. Perhaps you should listen again to Trump's past interviews, in which he always said that an extension would only be possible with the inclusion of China.

Eia119d ago

With that level of conviction one would think you should own some yes shares before calling out the other side? Please fill some more of my no position. But you are ignoring the fact that the treaty has been dead since the Rus/Ukr war and that the US has no benefit of signing it. No less, since the orange buffoon took office the world order has drastically changed, to the point where "last 50 years" is irrelevant.

Porx119d ago

I sold at the highest point because liquidity would still come here.

Eia119d ago

I see, nice profit there. Whats your Yes target price for re-entry? Looking forward to the future fill

Porx119d ago

The US and Russia are negotiating an extension of the New START agreement - AXIOS
DM

DM7622131d ago

its a no by feb 4

IronCladAlliance146d ago

The comment below is complete bullshit. Trump said he would let the treaty expire. Quote: "When it expires, it expires."

Eia144d ago

Dont ruin his game. Porx always buys yes, comes with an undocumented claim, and then sells out. So trade against it instead.

Porx144d ago

I never lie, Trump actually said he wants to make a new deal, what's the problem?

Eia131d ago

Guess you are right, but would've been better if you sold 😅